Why this work exists

Surveillance vs. Clinical Autonomy

Applied insight from other fields: safety improves when people can tell the truth without being scored. PDI-Med encodes that for medicine.

No PHI to PDI Non-punitive Architecture, not policy Applied learning
Why

Why this work exists

I built PDI-Med because AI in medicine will otherwise drift toward outcome-based surveillance of physicians. When every decision is scored, care shifts from “what is best for this patient?” to “what protects me from the metric?” I wanted a system that makes that misuse technically impossible, not merely a promise to behave.

Value

Why you stand to gain

  • Physicians: protected cognitive space to practice judgment without being quietly scored.
  • Patients: clearer explanations and options because doctors can tell the truth without fear.
  • Institutions: risk reduction through better follow-up and documentation, without new PHI surface area.
  • Investors: a defensible architecture that resists surveillance capture and the ethical blowback that follows.
Applied Insight

This isn’t new—it's applied learning

Other fields learned that surveillance crushes judgment:

  • Aviation: ASRS works because reporting is de-identified and non-punitive; when data is used to punish, safety reporting collapses.
  • Education: “Teaching to the test” proved that metricized surveillance narrows thinking and drives talent out.
  • Engineering: Counting commits or LOC ruins code quality; quantity metrics punish good judgment.
  • Finance: Real-time scoring pushes risk-hugging and amplifies systemic fragility.

Medicine is even more sensitive because uncertainty is intrinsic. PDI-Med encodes the non-punitive, non-surveillance guardrails these fields wished they had from the start.

Anchor

Judgment vs. metrics

The question is not “should physicians be monitored?” The real question is “should medicine be governed by judgment or by metrics?” Metrics are tools; when they become levers of control, they corrupt what they measure. This is Goodhart’s Law applied to human care.

Plain

One-minute summary

This is the medical equivalent of aviation’s non-punitive safety reporting: it improves learning without turning judgment into a compliance metric. PDI-Med makes surveillance misuse technically infeasible—PHI stays local, outcomes aren’t mapped to identifiable clinicians, and single-physician drill-down is blocked. That preserves trust in the room, which is the only place medicine actually happens.